Published June 2003
Regional
leaders vow action to meet Boeing's 7E7
site-selection criteria
By
Bryan Corliss
Herald Business Writer
Everett’s chances
of becoming home to the Boeing Co.’s next new airliner are good, observers
said after the company released its site-selection criteria for the 7E7
in mid-May.
After reviewing the
list, “my first conclusion was Everett, “ said T.M. Sell, a professor
of political economy at Highline Community College and the author of a
book on Boeing. “The workers are there, the facilities are there, and
costs consequently would be lower than many other alternatives.”
Snohomish County
Executive Bob Drewel and other elected officials vowed to “work this as
hard as it can be worked” to ensure that Boeing builds its next-generation
airliner here.
“If I need to, I
will build a new red barn for Boeing myself,” said U.S. Rep. Rick Larsen.
Report:
7E7 program would have
$1.2 billion economic impact
SCBJ
Staff
The Boeing Co.’s
7E7 program would generate about 7,500 jobs and have a total economic
impact of about $1.2 billion a year for the Puget Sound region,
according to a study commissioned for the Snohomish County Workforce
Development Council.
The report by
consultant Robert Chase of Kirkland was issued prior to Boeing’s
announcement that it plans to employ between 800 and 1,200 people
on the 7E7 line, wherever it is located.
That estimate
still is preliminary, and doesn’t consider the number of people
to be hired by local parts suppliers or shipping companies Boeing
spokeswoman Mary Hanson said. Boeing did not participate in the
study.
Chase estimates
that Boeing would hire 4,000 workers, and its suppliers would hire
3,500 more. That would be the initial work force needed in 2008,
when Boeing plans to launch the 7E7.
Those workers
would earn about $600 million a year, he estimated. Their paychecks,
in turn, would help support close to 13,000 other workers providing
other goods and services. The combination of this direct and indirect
spending would pump $1.2 billion into the regional economy, adjusted
for inflation.
|
Transportation issues,
facilities and the cost of doing business top the list of criteria Boeing
is considering as it looks at where it will build the new jet.
Final assembly of
the plane will take place within the United States, the company said.
Between now and June
20, a site selection consultant hired by Boeing will take written applications
from interested state economic development agencies, said company spokeswoman
Mary Hanson. Boeing will choose a location by year’s end.
The site it picks
will have to fulfill the set of criteria Boeing released May 16, Hanson
said. That list includes:
- Suitable airport
access and proximity to a seaport, rail lines and interstate highways
that can handle heavy traffic between the port and the plant.
- Available land
and buildings for both 7E7 final assembly and for suppliers.
- The cost of land,
buildings, construction, site preparation, taxes and local government
services.
In addition, Boeing
said it will consider work-force issues, including the quality of local
schools; environmental considerations such as severe storms or earthquakes;
and community support for Boeing and other manufacturers.
The payoff for the
winning location: a Boeing assembly line and 800 to 1,200 jobs, Hanson
said.
Officials here said
they are confident that the “E” in 7E7 does in fact stand for Everett.
“Everett stacks up
pretty good against the site-selection criteria,” Larsen said.
When it comes to
construction costs, Boeing’s Everett factory is the world’s largest building
by volume, and “given what they’ve done with production, they could easily
accommodate the 7E7 in the existing facility,” Sell said.
Boeing and the Port
of Everett are working on plans for a new pier that would improve the
company’s cargo-handling. Gov. Gary Locke has said he would ask for $16
million in state money to build the pier, which would be at the Mukilteo
tank farm and would allow Boeing to run parts directly by rail from the
waterfront to the factory.
Boeing officials
have complained loudly about the region’s crowded freeways, but “a transportation
fix is on the way” now that the Legislature has approved a 5-cent-a-gallon
gas tax for highway improvements, said Mark Blondin, Machinists union
district president.
In addition, Larsen
said he is pursuing federal money dedicated to easing the flow of freight.
When it comes to
work force, the Seattle area has “the deepest highly skilled labor pool
in the world for aerospace,” Blondin said.
That could be a key
factor, said Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace analyst with the Teal Group
in Virginia. Other states will dangle tax incentives or lower labor costs,
he said, but the Puget Sound area’s history as a jet-building center gives
it a clear advantage.
“Low cost doesn’t
mean more efficient,” he said. “There’s a balance to be struck between
cost and productivity.”
U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell
said her proposed composite materials research center at the University
of Washington would help “create new training opportunities so our workers
can acquire even more skills.” A number of schools, including Edmonds
Community College, have launched efforts toward this, the Democrat noted.
Permits wouldn’t
be an issue if Boeing decided to build the plane in Everett, said Mayor
Frank Anderson. Boeing and the city already have worked together on the
environmental studies that would be required for the company to expand
the factory.
There are a couple
of criteria that need to be worked on, the officials acknowledged.
Snohomish County
PUD and its suppliers need to stabilize electricity costs, Drewel said.
The Legislature needs
to address Boeing’s complaints with the unemployment compensation system,
Larsen said.
And the region needs
to make a show of support for Boeing, several officials said.
The Regional Partnership,
comprising government, business and labor leaders from around Puget Sound,
said “losing the 7E7 would be a catastrophe” and called on legislators
to “take bold and dramatic action that demonstrates Washington will do
what it takes to win the competition to assemble the 7E7 here.”
“We can’t afford
to lose, and we absolutely intend to win,” Drewel said. “I’m very confident
that come June 20, we’ll not only have a competitive package, we’ll have
the best package.”
Related:
Boeing 767 tanker deal approved
Back
to the top/June
2003 Main Menu